PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threat of COVID-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in person, via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options. Learn more about Navigating COVID-19 here.
Burns & Hansen, P.A.
Call us today for a FREE initial discussion
A Full Service Twin Cities Law Firm
Navigating your legal issues can be
confusing and complicated.

Good, bad or, well, just news: State's sand is fit for fracking p3

This is the last in a series of posts about a dispute in Houston County, Minnesota. The Erickson mine had been part of a scheme to produce major quantities of sand for use in hydraulic fracturing. The frac operation never got off the ground, and Erickson pulled out. As we have explained in our last two posts, the sequence of events has forced the mine to go through a more complicated permit renewal process. We are picking up where we left off in our July 14, 2014, post.

Erickson cleared another hurdle when the state released the mine from the environmental impact statement requirement, and the renewal request went to the county commission again. Erickson had reassured everyone that the permit was for production sand, not frac sand.

One of the commissioners had a serious concern about renewing the permit. Mines must include an operation plan with the application, and Erickson's plan looked a lot like the one that was filed with the frac sand permit request. Another inconsistency on the renewal was the size of the site; it was much smaller this time than in the past.

These red flags may have tipped the scales for local opponents of fracking, too. Skeptical that Erickson would indeed limit production to construction sand, they petitioned the court to block the permit renewal. The argument was on a technicality: You cannot renew a permit that has expired. Erickson should have to start the permit application process all over again.

The court denied the request for a number of reasons. One of those reasons was that the opponents had other legal options, like petitioning for an injunction once the permit has been renewed. An injunction would shut the mine down while the parties tried to resolve the controversy.

The county commission approved the renewal of Erickson's conditional use permit. According to the county land use attorney, there really was no other choice. Once granted, a conditional use permit renews automatically, in perpetuity, he said. Only if the mine violates the conditions can the county act to revoke the permit.


Winona Post, "Houston sand mine appeal denied," Chris Rogers, June 25, 2014

Home-town News, "Houston County sand mine to reopen," Craig Moorhead, July 7, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Rated by Super Lawyers
  • TwinWest Chamber of Commerce
  • MSBA - Minnesota State Bar Association
  • BBB Accredited Business
  • Ramsey County
  • Hennepin County - Bar Association
  • ABA

How Can We Help You?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Pay Your Bill Online: It’s easy and secure with LawPay
Pay My Bill