PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threat of COVID-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in person, via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options. Learn more about Navigating COVID-19 here.
Burns & Hansen, P.A.
Call us today for a FREE initial discussion
A Full Service Twin Cities Law Firm
Navigating your legal issues can be
confusing and complicated.

Unemployment Benefits and Progressive Discipline

In a recent decision, the Minnesota Supreme Court clarified that a former employee can be denied eligibility for unemployment benefits if he engaged in "employment misconduct," even where the employer terminated the former employee in violation of its own progressive discipline policy.

"Employment misconduct" for purposes of eligibility for unemployment benefits is defined by statute, but can generally be described as a serious violation of the standards of behavior an employer has a right to expect.

In this case, the former employee was terminated for excessive absenteeism and tardiness. The employer had a progressive discipline policy, which was contained in the employee handbook. The employer had been following the progressive discipline policy in dealing with employee's past absenteeism and tardiness. As a result, the former employee had received past oral warnings and a two-day suspension.

However, eventually the employer apparently lost patience with the employee, and terminated him, rather than issuing a ten-day suspension (which would have been the next level of discipline, and which was the last level before termination). The employee subsequently filed for unemployment benefits, and was denied.

On appeal, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that, at least on the question of eligibility for unemployment benefits, an employer's failure to follow its progressive discipline policy had no effect on whether the employee had committed employment misconduct. As the Court stated, "[p]ut another way, an employee's expectation that the employer will follow its disciplinary procedures has no bearing on whether the employee's conduct violated the standards the employer has a reasonable right to expect or whether any such violation is serious."

It is important to note that the Court was not asked to review whether the employee had been wrongfully terminated.

Also, the question of whether an employee's conduct amounts to employment misconduct depends on the circumstances of each case. It is important to consult with experienced employment counsel, such as the attorneys of Patrick Burns & Associates, for any employment issues.

The case is Stagg v. Vintage Place, Inc., 2011 WL 1485426 (Minn. April 20, 2011).

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Rated by Super Lawyers
  • TwinWest Chamber of Commerce
  • MSBA - Minnesota State Bar Association
  • BBB Accredited Business
  • Ramsey County
  • Hennepin County - Bar Association
  • ABA

How Can We Help You?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Pay Your Bill Online: It’s easy and secure with LawPay
Pay My Bill